I have been keeping a watch on a recent, rather predictable, development by the Far Left. This is a so-called Coalition of Resistance that is opposed to the budgetary restraints being introduced by the Government.It ticks all the expected boxes, such as who "will be affected most" (as they claim), and is easy enough to see through.
Presumably that is why the Government has been receiving overall approval from the public, even in these difficult times.
Inevitably, this other coalition's "sign-up sheet" (a statement with room for signatures in a petition format) attempts to rubbish the real reason for the necessity to make budget reductions, and to redress balances in our society that were so heavily skewed during the Labour years. I doubt that many folk will be taken in. Nothing much seems to have happened during the weeks I have been watching...
The top of the signatures list on that sign-up sheet/statement tells the real story; and I have taken a copy for my records. Here are the first eighteen...
- Tony Benn
- Caroline Lucas MP
- John McDonnell MP
- Jeremy Corbyn MP
- Mark Serwotka, general secretary PCS
- Bob Crow, general secretary RMT
- Jeremy Dear, general secretary NUJ
- Michelle Stanistreet, deputy general secretary, NUJ
- Frank Cooper, president of the National Pensioners Convention
- Dot Gibson, general secretary of the National Pensioners Convention
- Ken Loach
- John Pilger
- John Hendy QC
- Mark Steel
- Kevin Courtney, deputy general secretary NUT
- Cllr Salma Yaqoob (Respect)
- Lee Jasper, joint coordinator of Black Activists Rise Against Cuts (Barac)
- Zita Holbourne, joint co-ordinator of Barac campaign and PCS national executive;
Of course, the reality is that we all survived perfectly well in the pre-Labour days with vastly lower levels of public expenditure anyway. The country was in an economically sound state, we didn't need all these welfare billions spent (some, yes, but nothing like today's costs) and we were generally fine as a nation.
Now that it is necessary and unavoidable (despite what some claim) to make public spending reductions, and that even the former Labour Chancellor acknowledged that and his own desire to raise VAT, it is time to re-balance governmental priorities so as to lead to a sustainable future, not the cul-de-sac built on a cliff-head that has been Labour's Britain for years now. There was nowhere for us to go, except a very big and fatal drop off the cliff.
Of course, the Lefties behind the Coalition of Resistance (CoR) are well aware of all of this, but (rather like the Labour leadership contenders) carry on as if everyone has forgotten the reality that gradually dawned on most of our population during Labour's thirteen years running Britain (running it down, in fact). Those five are playing to the remaining core of the Labour Party: the CoR would need to have a far broader appeal if they were ever to make any impact.
No doubt their planned activities will receive huge media coverage by the BBC and the other "usual suspects" in the press and broadcasters, and they are undoubtedly counting on that to give them an air of significance. Most of the rest of us will just ignore them unless they really do act in the way they claim, as Jonathon Isaby recently pointed out:
Worryingly, given the riots that we recently saw on the streets of Athens, they add:"We reject this malicious vandalism and resolve to campaign for a radical alternative, with the level of determination shown by trade unionists and social movements in Greece and other European countries."
Those of us who remember the 'seventies and part of the 'eighties will be well aware of the levels of behaviour down to which Trade Union rabble-rousers are capable of compelling their members, so anything could happen if they really do emulate the riots in Greece.
Sort of reads like a who's who list of those first up against the wall in the coming revolution really.
ReplyDeleteThey never do seem to grasp that it's our money they are spending on their pet projects and that the public for the moment have had enough of the government picking their pockets, in this from my opinion I don't believe the coalition have gone far enough, they've just slowed down the spending not reversed it. Still at least they are a lot better than those spendthrifts in your list.
Odd thing is, a quick check of that list shows that they are not short of a bob or two themselves, they can afford high taxation, I can't.
This brings back memories of my last year at polytechnic (first year of Mrs Thatcher). Interesting that two or three names on this list are the same people!
ReplyDeleteThe difference back then, was that we had the Soviet Union, and the Left had motivation and a recruiting base. We also had no laws to control the trade unions.
Society has moved on. Hardly anyone is motivated by the outdated Left v Right struggle these days, even at university. (Serves Blair right for encouraging large numbers of ordinary folk to go there.) People are willing to be flexible in their approach to work and dealing with their finances, and most of us want to see Britain return to being a prosperous country.
Agreed entirely, though (as the best, most thorough and honest assessments have explained, in various places) George Osborne is having to tread a very narrow path for the time being.
ReplyDeleteHe is between a rock and a hard place, as the saying goes.
The plan is to reduce the deficit to zero over the next four to five years, and from then on to reduce the overall debt to something far more sensible and manageable by the end of a second term, or perhaps a little after (it's not possible to predict precisely that far ahead).
It is the only way our nation will in fact survive as a sovereign State.
I think I agree with Quiet Man - it is a list of those that are first against the wall!
ReplyDeleteGood effort JW - keep 'em coming!
Well, it might be at that...
ReplyDeleteWhy am I reminded of the Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy whenever I read about those "first against the wall when the revolution comes"? :-)